Which of these must your AML platform actually do?

Mark the lines that matter to your firm. The count updates as you mark, against 17 source-checked Australian products. No signup, no email — this schedule never leaves your browser.

Requirements — mark what you must have

AML/CTF program creationThe software helps you produce an AML/CTF program document, not just a checklist.Customer due diligenceStructured capture of customer details with a recorded verification decision.Know-your-business (entity checks)Verifying a company or other entity against a reliable independent source — separate from checking the people behind it.Beneficial ownership and controlIdentifying who ultimately owns or controls an entity, with threshold logic. This is different from a basic company check.PEP and sanctions screeningScreening against politically exposed persons and sanctions lists, including DFAT consolidated lists.Ongoing customer monitoringScheduled or event-triggered re-review of customers — not just a one-off check at onboarding.Suspicious matter report workflowInternal escalation of unusual activity through to a filing decision. This is not the same as direct AUSTRAC submission.Evidence pack exportPackages records and evidence for review — for example handing a bundle to an auditor or evaluator.Australian data residencyClient data must be held onshore in Australia.

Tickmark legend

Agreedagreed to public source
Queriedqueried — conditional or limited
Not obtainednot obtained — not a 'no'
Not agreednot agreed — confirmed absent

How the match is worked

A-2/1
You mark the schedule
Your industry, firm size, client types and the capabilities you care about — in plain English, with every technical term explained where it appears.
A-2/2
Every record is worked the same way
Your requirements are cast against the same structured provider data. Same fields, same weights, same statuses — the engine holds no provider-specific rule.
A-2/3
The workings stay on the paper
Ranked matches with what was agreed, what is queried, what was not obtained, what is excluded and why — plus the questions to ask before you buy.

What a worked match looks like

Example only

Worked live from the real records for a full-lifecycle accounting buyer with nine must-haves and mandatory Australian residency.

Strongest match

duely

platform

aligned

Agreed to source

AML/CTF program creation · Customer due diligence · Know-your-business (entity checks) · Beneficial ownership and control

Queried before purchase

No open queries for this example buyer

Evidence confidence 100%

Work my own schedule

Index — by what you need

Index — by industry

We compare against the sectors each provider publicly markets to — not a judgement about which legal obligations apply to your firm.

Basis of preparation

Provider facts originate from AML Directory — the source-checked directory, not a second database we maintain.
Every capability is agreed, queried, not agreed or not obtained — and “not obtained” is never worked as a “no”.
Price information is normalised where possible; price-on-application stays price-on-application.
Results carry their own uncertainty, and no product is treated as compliant merely because it appears here.

Same rules for every product

The matching engine has no favourite. If a product is a strong fit, it ranks strongly; if it fails a must-have, it is excluded — whoever makes it. You can inspect the workings of any result.

Products17

Fields tracked31

Source records204

Data versionv1-efae05fb5d

Read the matching method