First AML vs FreeAML
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
Product A
First AML
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 58%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing, Financial services
- Data residency
- mixed
Product B
FreeAML
Verification layer
- Entry price
- $15.00/check
- Evidence
- 54%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Conveyancing, Legal
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose First AML when...
- Enhanced due diligence is verified — FreeAML has not established it.
- API access is verified — FreeAML has not established it.
Choose FreeAML when...
- AML/CTF program creation is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Staff training is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Adverse media screening is verified — First AML has not established it.
Where both fit
Risk assessmentCustomer due diligenceKnow-your-business (entity checks)Beneficial ownership and controlElectronic identity verificationBiometric liveness and face matchPEP and sanctions screeningOngoing customer monitoringEvidence pack export
Biggest differences
| Field | First AML | FreeAML |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | No | Verified |
| Staff training | No | Verified |
| Enhanced due diligence | Verified | Not established |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | Not established | Verified |
| Adverse media screening | Partial | Verified |
| API access | Verified | Not established |
| Product type | Platform | Verification |
| Named integrations | 12 named | 0 named |
| Data residency | mixed | unknown |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation No Verified
- Program maintenance and review Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Risk assessment Verified Verified
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Staff training No Verified
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence Verified Verified
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Verified Verified
- Beneficial ownership and control Verified Verified
- Enhanced due diligence Verified Needs confirmation
- Reliance arrangements Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification Verified Verified
- Biometric liveness and face match Verified Verified
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Needs confirmation Verified
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening Verified Verified
- Adverse media screening Partial Verified
- Ongoing customer monitoring Verified Verified
- Transaction monitoring Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Threshold transaction reporting Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export Verified Verified
- Immutable audit log Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- API access Verified Needs confirmation
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewIndependent evaluation support (s84)Reliance arrangementsDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessTransaction monitoringSuspicious matter report workflowAUSTRAC SMR XML exportTipping-off controls (s123)
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 25 August 2026. Source records: First AML on AML Directory · FreeAML on AML Directory