SubjectTwo records, worked side by side
Records checked to8 October 2026
First AML vs NameScan
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
First AML
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 65%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing, Financial services
- Data residency
- australia
NameScan
Verification layer
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 6%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose First AML when...
- Risk assessment is verified — NameScan has not established it.
- Customer due diligence is verified — NameScan has not established it.
- Know-your-business (entity checks) is verified — NameScan has not established it.
- Beneficial ownership and control is verified — NameScan has not established it.
- Enhanced due diligence is verified — NameScan has not established it.
Choose NameScan when...
Nothing separates them here: every capability agreed for NameScan is at least established for First AML too.
Biggest differences
| Field | First AML | NameScan |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | No | Not established |
| Risk assessment | Verified | Not established |
| Staff training | No | Not established |
| Customer due diligence | Verified | Not established |
| Know-your-business (entity checks) | Verified | Not established |
| Beneficial ownership and control | Verified | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | Verified | Not established |
| Electronic identity verification | Verified | Not established |
| Biometric liveness and face match | Verified | Not established |
| PEP and sanctions screening | Verified | Not established |
| Adverse media screening | Partial | Not established |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | Verified | No |
| Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) | Not established | Partial |
| Evidence pack export | Verified | Not established |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
First AMLNameScan
- AML/CTF program creation Not agreed Not obtained
- Program maintenance and review Not obtained Not obtained
- Risk assessment Agreed Not obtained
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Not obtained Not obtained
- Staff training Not agreed Not obtained
CDD & entity work
First AMLNameScan
- Customer due diligence Agreed Not obtained
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Agreed Not obtained
- Beneficial ownership and control Agreed Not obtained
- Enhanced due diligence Agreed Not obtained
- Reliance arrangements Not obtained Not obtained
Identity verification
First AMLNameScan
- Electronic identity verification Agreed Not obtained
- Biometric liveness and face match Agreed Not obtained
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Not obtained Not obtained
Screening & monitoring
First AMLNameScan
- PEP and sanctions screening Agreed Not obtained
- Adverse media screening Queried Not obtained
- Ongoing customer monitoring Agreed Not agreed
- Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) Not obtained Queried
Reporting & control
First AMLNameScan
- Suspicious matter report workflow Not obtained Not obtained
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Not obtained Not obtained
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Not obtained Not obtained
- Threshold transaction reporting Not obtained Not obtained
Evidence & extensibility
First AMLNameScan
- Evidence pack export Agreed Not obtained
- Immutable audit log Not obtained Not obtained
- API access Agreed Not obtained
Tranche 2 operations
First AMLNameScan
- Risk assessed per designated service Queried Not obtained
- Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk Queried Not obtained
- Program obligations calendar Not obtained Not obtained
- Versioned AML program and CDD records Queried Not obtained
- Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recorded Agreed Not obtained
- Expired document alerts Agreed Not obtained
- Reliance CDD requests sent and received Agreed Not obtained
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewIndependent evaluation support (s84)Reliance arrangementsDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessAutomated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules)Suspicious matter report workflowAUSTRAC SMR XML exportTipping-off controls (s123)
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 8 October 2026. Source records: First AML on AML Directory · NameScan on AML Directory