SimpleAML vs StackGo IdentityCheck
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
Product A
SimpleAML
Local register
- Entry price
- $0.00/mo
- Evidence
- 54%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Conveyancing
- Data residency
- Not established
Product B
StackGo IdentityCheck
Verification layer
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 71%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose SimpleAML when...
- Risk assessment is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Staff training is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Tipping-off controls (s123) is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
Choose StackGo IdentityCheck when...
- Electronic identity verification is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Biometric liveness and face match is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- PEP and sanctions screening is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
Biggest differences
| Field | SimpleAML | StackGo IdentityCheck |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | Partial | No |
| Risk assessment | Verified | No |
| Staff training | Verified | No |
| Customer due diligence | Partial | No |
| Know-your-business (entity checks) | No | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | Not established | No |
| Electronic identity verification | No | Verified |
| Biometric liveness and face match | Not established | Verified |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | Not established | No |
| PEP and sanctions screening | No | Verified |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | Not established | No |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | Partial | No |
| Tipping-off controls (s123) | Verified | No |
| Threshold transaction reporting | Not established | No |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation Partial No
- Program maintenance and review Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Risk assessment Verified No
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Staff training Verified No
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence Partial No
- Know-your-business (entity checks) No Needs confirmation
- Beneficial ownership and control Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Enhanced due diligence Needs confirmation No
- Reliance arrangements Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification No Verified
- Biometric liveness and face match Needs confirmation Verified
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Needs confirmation No
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening No Verified
- Adverse media screening Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Ongoing customer monitoring Needs confirmation No
- Transaction monitoring No No
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow Partial No
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export No No
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Verified No
- Threshold transaction reporting Needs confirmation No
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export No No
- Immutable audit log No No
- API access Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewIndependent evaluation support (s84)Beneficial ownership and controlEnhanced due diligenceReliance arrangementsBiometric liveness and face matchDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessAdverse media screening
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 25 August 2026. Source records: SimpleAML on AML Directory · StackGo IdentityCheck on AML Directory